Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 21 236250 WET 03 OZ
266 Royal York Rd; 268 Royal York Rd
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- In progress
- Submitted
- 9 November 2021
- Appealed
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 266 Royal York Rd; 268 Royal York Rd
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 9 November 2021
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
The proposed development consists of a mixed-use building with 36 storey and 29 storey towers (respectively 116.2 m and 98.7 m in height excl. mechanical penthouses) 413 sqm of retail at grade, a 12,374 sqm multi-storey self-storage building as a future phase, and a 1,146 m² public park.Related applications: Zoning Amendment (21 236250 WET 03 OZ), Subdivision (21 236297 WET 03 SB), Site Plan (21 252097 WET 03 SA)
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Royal Mimico Developments Limited · registration SM32530
266 Royal York Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32530: 266 Royal York Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 236250 WET 03 OZ at 268 Royal York Rd: The proposed development consists of a mixed-use building with 36 storey and 29 storey towers (respectively 116.2 m and 98.7 m in height excl. mechanical penthouses) 413 sqm of retail at grade, a 12,374 sqm multi-storey self-storage building as a future phase, and a 1,146 m² public park.Related app… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 266 Royal York Road
Matched fields
- address
- 266 ROYAL YORK RD
- application_address
- 266 ROYAL YORK RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 16% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.