Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 21 235021 STE 09 CD

Ward 9 · Alejandra BravoDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 6 November 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 2 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 1200 Dundas St W
Ward: Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Submitted: 6 November 2021
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 115 units
Related file: 17 181165 STE 19 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft Plan of Condominium for 115 units.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Fieldgate Urban · registration SM29032
1200 Dundas St W
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29032: 1200 Dundas St W (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 235021 STE 09 CD at 1200 Dundas St W: Draft Plan of Condominium for 115 units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1200 Dundas St W
Matched fields
address
1200 DUNDAS ST W
application_address
1200 DUNDAS ST W

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 9 Davenport2

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 9 Davenport	Member of council	2	2	19 May 2020

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Arcadis Architects (Canada) Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Fieldgate Homes
SM27275 · 3 January 2019 · “1200 Dundas Street West”
Fieldgate Homes
SM25333 · 16 November 2017 · “1200 Dundas Street West”
Fieldgate Homes
SM22616 · 5 January 2016 · “1200 Dundas St. W.”
Pattison Outdoor Advertising
SM18857 · 21 January 2013 · “1200 Dundas Street west”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9

2 lobbied · 4 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9: 2 lobbied and 4 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.