lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 21 234490 STE 13 OZ

1 Isabella St; 3 Isabella St; 5 Isabella St; 7 Isabella St; 9 Isabella St; 619 Yonge St; 621 Yonge St; 623 Yonge St; 623A Yonge St; 623B Yonge St; 625 Yonge St; 627 Yonge St; 629 Yonge St; 631 Yonge St; 633 Yonge St; 635 Yonge St; 637 Yonge St

Status
Appeal Received
In progress
Submitted
5 November 2021
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
3
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
12
4 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
1 Isabella St; 3 Isabella St; 5 Isabella St; 7 Isabella St; 9 Isabella St; 619 Yonge St; 621 Yonge St; 623 Yonge St; 623A Yonge St; 623B Yonge St; 625 Yonge St; 627 Yonge St; 629 Yonge St; 631 Yonge St; 633 Yonge St; 635 Yonge St; 637 Yonge St
Ward
Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted
5 November 2021
Status
Appeal Received
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
Yes
Size stated in the description
606 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application for a 57-storey mixed-use building with 3,134 square metres of non-residential space and 606 dwelling units.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

3 linked registrations · 12 communications · 4 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
Data table· 3 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Chris MoiseCouncillor staff6328 February 2024
Ward 13 OfficeCouncillor staff4024 May 2022
Chris MoiseMember of council2122 February 2024

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

83 lobbied · 97 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=10
  • Matched, unlobbied93% n=14

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied11%
  • Matched, unlobbied17%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 83 lobbied and 97 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied83—100% (n=10)0%11%0.14
Matched, unlobbied971,79393% (n=14)7%17%0.08
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.