Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 21 226750 NNY 18 OZ
- Status
- Council Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 16 October 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 150-160 Cactus Ave
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 16 October 2021
- Status
- Council Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 469 units; 36,850 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application to facilitate the development of the site for a mixed use development comprised of 13- and 14-storey apartment buildings, and two 4-storey back to back townhouse buildings. The proposed residential gross floor area is 36,850 square metres. A total of 469 residential dwelling units are proposed, of which, 60 shall be rental dwelling units. A 2,126 square metre public park is also proposed on site.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Resident · registration SM34048
150-160 Cactus Ave. - Proposed Redevelopment
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34048: 150-160 Cactus Ave. - Proposed Redevelopment (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 226750 NNY 18 OZ at 150-160 Cactus Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application to facilitate the development of the site for a mixed use development comprised of 13- and 14-storey apartment buildings, and two 4-storey back to back townhouse buildings. The proposed residential gross floor area is 36,850 square metres. A tot… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 150-160 Cactus Ave. - Proposed Redevelopment
Matched fields
- address
- 150-160 CACTUS AVE
- application_address
- 150-160 CACTUS AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
38 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 38 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 21% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.