Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 21 215063 STE 11 SA

372 1/2 Yonge St; 374 Yonge St; 374A Yonge St; 376 Yonge St; 378 Yonge St

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 20 September 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 5; 2 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 372 1/2 Yonge St; 374 Yonge St; 374A Yonge St; 376 Yonge St; 378 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 20 September 2021
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 415 units; 33,145 m² gross floor area
Related file: 20 174053 STE 11 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Approval for a 73-storey mixed-use building having an non-residential gross floor area of 954.50 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 33,144.90 square metres with 415 dwelling units.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

DC Dev Corp · registration SM33106
Rezoning and Site Plan applications approval for new mixed use building at 372, 374, 374A, 376 and 378 Yonge Street. Applications: 20-174053 STE 11 OZ and 21-215063 STE 11 SA.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.96
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM33106: Rezoning and Site Plan applications approval for new mixed use building at 372, 374, 374A, 376 and 378 Yonge Street. Applications: 20-174053 STE 11 OZ and 21-215063 STE 11 SA. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 215063 STE 11 SA at 372 Yonge St: Site Plan Approval for a 73-storey mixed-use building having an non-residential gross floor area of 954.50 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 33,144.90 square metres with 415 dwelling units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning and Site Plan applications approval for new mixed use building at 372, 374, 374A, 376 and 378 Yonge Street. Applications: 20-174053 STE 11 OZ and 21-215063 STE 11 SA.
Matched fields
address
378 YONGE ST
application_address
378 YONGE ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 5 communications · 2 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 11 University-Rosedale2
Dianne Saxe2
Dianne Saxe1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 11 University-Rosedale	Member of council	2	2	22 April 2022
Dianne Saxe	Councillor staff	2	0	5 April 2024
Dianne Saxe	Member of council	1	0	5 April 2024

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Pattison Outdoor Advertising
SM11464 · 31 March 2008 · “378 Yonge St.”
Pattison Outdoor Advertising
SM11316 · 5 March 2008 · “378 Yonge St.”
Pattison Outdoor Advertising
SM11332 · 3 March 2008 · “378 Yonge Street”
Pattison Outdoor Advertising
SM11333 · 3 March 2008 · “378 Yonge St.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11

46 lobbied · 113 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,629

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=2
Matched, unlobbied100% n=12

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied9%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11: 46 lobbied and 113 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	46	—	100% (n=2)	0%	9%	0.09
Matched, unlobbied	113	1,629	100% (n=12)	0%	2%	0.02

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.