Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 21 211001 STE 12 CD
61 Brownlow Ave; 63 Brownlow Ave; 65 Brownlow Ave; 67 Brownlow Ave; 69 Brownlow Ave; 71 Brownlow Ave; 73 Brownlow Ave; 75 Brownlow Ave
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 10 September 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 61 Brownlow Ave; 63 Brownlow Ave; 65 Brownlow Ave; 67 Brownlow Ave; 69 Brownlow Ave; 71 Brownlow Ave; 73 Brownlow Ave; 75 Brownlow Ave
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 10 September 2021
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 384 units
- Related file
- 21 203868 STE 12 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
*** Draft Plan of Standard Condominium to permit 384 residential units in a 35-storey residential building with a 2-level underground parking garage containing 69 vehicular parking spaces.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Malen Capital Corporation · registration SM35220
ZBA in support of the redevelopment of 54-76 Brownlow Avenue.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35220: ZBA in support of the redevelopment of 54-76 Brownlow Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 211001 STE 12 CD at 61 Brownlow Ave: *** Draft Plan of Standard Condominium to permit 384 residential units in a 35-storey residential building with a 2-level underground parking garage containing 69 vehicular parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA in support of the redevelopment of 54-76 Brownlow Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 54-76 BROWNLOW AVE
- application_address
- 61 BROWNLOW AVE
Menkes Developments Ltd · registration SM32011
61-75 Brownlow Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32011: 61-75 Brownlow Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 211001 STE 12 CD at 61 Brownlow Ave: *** Draft Plan of Standard Condominium to permit 384 residential units in a 35-storey residential building with a 2-level underground parking garage containing 69 vehicular parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 61-75 Brownlow Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 61-75 BROWNLOW AVE
- application_address
- 61 BROWNLOW AVE
Menkes Developments Ltd · registration SM31855
61-75 Brownlow Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31855: 61-75 Brownlow Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 211001 STE 12 CD at 61 Brownlow Ave: *** Draft Plan of Standard Condominium to permit 384 residential units in a 35-storey residential building with a 2-level underground parking garage containing 69 vehicular parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 61-75 Brownlow Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 61-75 BROWNLOW AVE
- application_address
- 61 BROWNLOW AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
3 linked registrations · 6 communications · 3 meetings · 3 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Matlow | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 9 April 2024 |
| Councillor Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 7 July 2021 |
| Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul's | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 17 June 2021 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12
5 lobbied · 11 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.