Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 21 210738 WET 03 SA
111 Shorncliffe Rd; 113 Shorncliffe Rd; 115 Shorncliffe Rd; 119 Shorncliffe Rd; 121 Shorncliffe Rd; 127 Shorncliffe Rd
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 10 September 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 111 Shorncliffe Rd; 113 Shorncliffe Rd; 115 Shorncliffe Rd; 119 Shorncliffe Rd; 121 Shorncliffe Rd; 127 Shorncliffe Rd
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 10 September 2021
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Addition and Renovations to Meat Packaging Plant. Expand Office Area, 2 Storey and Production Area with Coolers on 2nd Storey. Parking Area provided North of Building with Acquisition of Lots to Include Address 111-127(Increase Existing Site 4818m2 lot size by approximately 4492m2 for total of 9310m2)
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Stacey Weisberg · registration SM33331
site plan application 121 Shorncliffe Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33331: site plan application 121 Shorncliffe Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 210738 WET 03 SA at 111 Shorncliffe Rd: Addition and Renovations to Meat Packaging Plant. Expand Office Area, 2 Storey and Production Area with Coolers on 2nd Storey. Parking Area provided North of Building with Acquisition of Lots to Include Address 111-127(Increase Existing Site 4818m2 lot size by approximately 4492m2 for total of 9310… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: site plan application 121 Shorncliffe Road
Matched fields
- address
- 121 SHORNCLIFFE RD
- application_address
- 121 SHORNCLIFFE RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | — | 71% (n=10) | 29% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.