Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 21 201799 STE 12 SA

29 Pleasant Blvd; 31 Pleasant Blvd; 33 Pleasant Blvd; 39 Pleasant Blvd

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Appeal Received; In progress
Submitted: 20 August 2021; Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 6; 0 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 29 Pleasant Blvd; 31 Pleasant Blvd; 33 Pleasant Blvd; 39 Pleasant Blvd
Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted: 20 August 2021
Status: Appeal Received
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: Yes
Related file: 24 119348 STE 12 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Approval for a 50-storey residential building.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Pleasant Condos Limited Partnership · registration SM34852
Planning Rationale in support of Minor Variance & Site Plan Approval applications in connection with redevelopment of 29 to 39 Pleasant Boulevard.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.96
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34852: Planning Rationale in support of Minor Variance & Site Plan Approval applications in connection with redevelopment of 29 to 39 Pleasant Boulevard. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 201799 STE 12 SA at 29 Pleasant Blvd: Site Plan Approval for a 50-storey residential building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …ning Rationale in support of Minor Variance & Site Plan Approval applications in connection with redevelopment of 29 to 39 Pleasant Boulevard.
Matched fields
address
39 PLEASANT BLVD
application_address
39 PLEASANT BLVD
Pleasant Condos Limited Partnership · registration SM34853
Planning Rationale in support of Minor Variance & Site Plan Approval applications in connection with redevelopment of 29 to 39 Pleasant Boulevard.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.96
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34853: Planning Rationale in support of Minor Variance & Site Plan Approval applications in connection with redevelopment of 29 to 39 Pleasant Boulevard. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 201799 STE 12 SA at 29 Pleasant Blvd: Site Plan Approval for a 50-storey residential building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …ning Rationale in support of Minor Variance & Site Plan Approval applications in connection with redevelopment of 29 to 39 Pleasant Boulevard.
Matched fields
address
39 PLEASANT BLVD
application_address
39 PLEASANT BLVD

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 6 communications · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Josh Matlow	Councillor staff	4	0	27 September 2023
Josh Matlow	Member of council	2	0	27 September 2023

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Graywood Developments Ltd.
SM33221 · 9 May 2022 · “39 Pleasant Boulevard.”
Yonge Pleasant Holdings Limited
SM32593 · 22 November 2021 · “29 Pleasant Boulevard”
College of Chiropractors of Ontario
SM22952 · 31 March 2016 · “29 Pleasant Blvd.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

32 lobbied · 72 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12: 32 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	32	—	100% (n=4)	0%	3%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	72	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.05

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.