Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 21 195478 ESC 21 OZ
1966 Eglinton Ave E; 1970 Eglinton Ave E; 1972 Eglinton Ave E; 1980 Eglinton Ave E
- Status
- OMB Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 9 August 2021
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1966 Eglinton Ave E; 1970 Eglinton Ave E; 1972 Eglinton Ave E; 1980 Eglinton Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
- Submitted
- 9 August 2021
- Status
- OMB Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 2,434 units
- Related file
- 15 258686 ESC 37 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development on the western portion of the RioCan lands in the Golden Mile Secondary Plan Area. The proposal consists of three development blocks, including a block for public parkland purposes. The application proposes building heights that range from 12-48 storeys, a total gross floor area of 190,718 (186,414 square metres for residential uses and 4,304 square metres for non-residential uses), 2,434 residential units, and a public park with an area of 19,433 square metres. The application is being reviewed concurrently with Draft Plan of Subdivision Application No. 21 195467 ESC 21 SB and is related to Official Plan Amendment Application No. 15 258686 ESC 37 OZ (under appeal).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21
15 lobbied · 21 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.