Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 21 187552 STE 13 SA
244 Church St; 250 Church St; 254 Church St; 258 Church St; 260 Church St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 21 July 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 244 Church St; 250 Church St; 254 Church St; 258 Church St; 260 Church St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 21 July 2021
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 681 units; 37,800 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 20 124315 STE 13 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Approval for a 52-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 315 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 37800 square metres. A total of 681 residential dwelling units are proposed.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
CentreCourt · registration SM28665
250 Church Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28665: 250 Church Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 187552 STE 13 SA at 258 Church St: Site Plan Approval for a 52-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 315 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 37800 square metres. A total of 681 residential dwelling units are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 250 Church Street
Matched fields
- address
- 250 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 250 CHURCH ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Titan Outdoor LLCSM18406 · 6 September 2012 · “260 Church Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.