Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 21 185451 STE 12 OZ
1406 Yonge St; 1414 Yonge St; 1420 Yonge St; 1428 Yonge St
- Status
- Council Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 16 July 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1406 Yonge St; 1414 Yonge St; 1420 Yonge St; 1428 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 16 July 2021
- Status
- Council Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
To allow a 50-storey mixed use building with commercial at grade, containing 534dwelling units.Inactive file: Paused on request of applicant until September 2026.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Metropia · registration SM31710
1406-1428 Yonge Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31710: 1406-1428 Yonge Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 185451 STE 12 OZ at 1406 Yonge St: To allow a 50-storey mixed use building with commercial at grade, containing 534dwelling units.Inactive file: Paused on request of applicant until September 2026. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1406-1428 Yonge Street
Matched fields
- address
- 1406-1428 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 1406 YONGE ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 5 communications · 0 meetings · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 7 July 2021 |
| Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul's | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 15 February 2022 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.