Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 21 176276 NNY 15 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 26 June 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 47 Ranleigh Ave
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Submitted
- 26 June 2021
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 16 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Application to demolish the existing two-storey residential building with three dwelling units and construct a new four-storey apartment building with a height of 12.95 metres and 16 dwelling units.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Newry Shao · registration SM31722
The proposed development at 47 Ranleigh Avenue.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31722: The proposed development at 47 Ranleigh Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 176276 NNY 15 OZ at 47 Ranleigh Ave: Application to demolish the existing two-storey residential building with three dwelling units and construct a new four-storey apartment building with a height of 12.95 metres and 16 dwelling units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: The proposed development at 47 Ranleigh Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 47 RANLEIGH AVE
- application_address
- 47 RANLEIGH AVE
Impressions Group · registration SM31661
Proposed 4 storey residential building with apartment units located at 47 Ranleigh Ave, Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31661: Proposed 4 storey residential building with apartment units located at 47 Ranleigh Ave, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 176276 NNY 15 OZ at 47 Ranleigh Ave: Application to demolish the existing two-storey residential building with three dwelling units and construct a new four-storey apartment building with a height of 12.95 metres and 16 dwelling units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed 4 storey residential building with apartment units located at 47 Ranleigh Ave, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 47 RANLEIGH AVE
- application_address
- 47 RANLEIGH AVE
Impression Design Builders Inc. · registration SM31569
The project location of this subject matters is 47 Ranleigh AveToronto, ON M4N 1X2
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31569: The project location of this subject matters is 47 Ranleigh AveToronto, ON M4N 1X2 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 176276 NNY 15 OZ at 47 Ranleigh Ave: Application to demolish the existing two-storey residential building with three dwelling units and construct a new four-storey apartment building with a height of 12.95 metres and 16 dwelling units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: The project location of this subject matters is 47 Ranleigh AveToronto, ON M4N 1X2
Matched fields
- address
- 47 RANLEIGH AVE
- application_address
- 47 RANLEIGH AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
3 linked registrations · 3 communications · 2 meetings · 3 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Jaye Robinson | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 4 June 2021 |
| Office of Councillor Jaye Robinson, Ward 15 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 4 June 2021 |
| Ward 15 Don Valley West | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 13 April 2021 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15
20 lobbied · 36 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 10% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 36 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 25% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.