Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 21 161587 WET 05 CD
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 27 May 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 2306 St. Clair Avenue West
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Submitted
- 27 May 2021
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 242 units
- Related file
- 18 204363 WET 11 SA
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Standard Condominium application for a 10-storey mixed use building which includes 242 residential units, commercial space at grade and 2 levels of below grade garage.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Marlin Spring Developments · registration SM32614
2306 St. Clair Avenue West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32614: 2306 St. Clair Avenue West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 161587 WET 05 CD at 2306 St Clair Ave W: Draft Plan of Standard Condominium application for a 10-storey mixed use building which includes 242 residential units, commercial space at grade and 2 levels of below grade garage. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2306 St. Clair Avenue West
Matched fields
- address
- 2306 ST CLAIR AVE W
- application_address
- 2306 ST CLAIR AVE W
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Marlin Spring DevelopmentsSM24587 · 1 May 2017 · “2306 St. Clair Avenue West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 5
2 lobbied · 3 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.