Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 20 233772 STE 12 SA
65 Raglan Ave; 67 Raglan Ave; 69 Raglan Ave; 71 Raglan Ave; 73 Raglan Ave; 75 Raglan Ave; 77 Raglan Ave; 79 Raglan Ave; 81 Raglan Ave; 83 Raglan Ave
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Approved
- Submitted
- 24 December 2020
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 65 Raglan Ave; 67 Raglan Ave; 69 Raglan Ave; 71 Raglan Ave; 73 Raglan Ave; 75 Raglan Ave; 77 Raglan Ave; 79 Raglan Ave; 81 Raglan Ave; 83 Raglan Ave
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 24 December 2020
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 19 137322 STE 12 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Control application for a new 28 Storey, Residential tower with 3 levels of underground parking
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Camrost-Felcorp · registration SM30764
zoning amendment and SPA for mixed use residential development at 65-83 Raglan Avenue ,Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30764: zoning amendment and SPA for mixed use residential development at 65-83 Raglan Avenue ,Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 233772 STE 12 SA at 65 Raglan Ave: Site Plan Control application for a new 28 Storey, Residential tower with 3 levels of underground parking (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: zoning amendment and SPA for mixed use residential development at 65-83 Raglan Avenue ,Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 65-83 RAGLAN AVE
- application_address
- 65 RAGLAN AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | 511 | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.