Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 20 233478 NNY 18 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 23 December 2020
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 6035 Bathurst St
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 23 December 2020
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Revised zoning by-law amendment application and new site plan submission to permit a 12-storey (originally 14-storeys) residential apartment building. The proposal would contain a total of 195 (originally 220) residential units and 14,339m2 (originally 15,269 m2) of residential gross floor area with a Floor Space Index (FSI) of 6.61 (originally 7.04).
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Resident · registration SM34047
6035 Bathurst Street - Proposed Redevelopment
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34047: 6035 Bathurst Street - Proposed Redevelopment (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 233478 NNY 18 OZ at 6035 Bathurst St: Revised zoning by-law amendment application and new site plan submission to permit a 12-storey (originally 14-storeys) residential apartment building. The proposal would contain a total of 195 (originally 220) residential units and 14,339m2 (originally 15,269 m2) of residential gross floor area wit… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 6035 Bathurst Street - Proposed Redevelopment
Matched fields
- address
- 6035 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 6035 BATHURST ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
38 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 38 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 21% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.