Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 20 214204 NNY 08 OZ
3180 Yonge St; 3180-3182 Yonge St; 3184 Yonge St; 3186 Yonge St; 3188 Yonge St; 3190 Yonge St; 3192 Yonge St; 3194 Yonge St; 3196 Yonge St; 3198 Yonge St; 3200 Yonge St; 3202 Yonge St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 3 November 2020
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 3180 Yonge St; 3180-3182 Yonge St; 3184 Yonge St; 3186 Yonge St; 3188 Yonge St; 3190 Yonge St; 3192 Yonge St; 3194 Yonge St; 3196 Yonge St; 3198 Yonge St; 3200 Yonge St; 3202 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Submitted
- 3 November 2020
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
—
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Montcrest Asset Management Inc. · registration SM30855
Zoning By-law Amendment application for 3180-3202 Yonge Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30855: Zoning By-law Amendment application for 3180-3202 Yonge Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 214204 NNY 08 OZ at 3180-3182 Yonge St: (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law Amendment application for 3180-3202 Yonge Street
Matched fields
- address
- 3180-3202 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 3180-3182 YONGE ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 5 communications · 0 meetings · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 15 Don Valley West | Member of council | 3 | 0 | 2 February 2021 |
| Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 2 February 2021 |
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8
33 lobbied · 57 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 33 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 12% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 57 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 27% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.