Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 20 210125 STE 04 SA

35 High Park Ave; 41 High Park Ave; 66 Pacific Ave; 95 High Park Ave; 102 Pacific Ave

Ward 4 · Gord PerksDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: NOAC Issued; Approved
Submitted: 23 October 2020; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 35 High Park Ave; 41 High Park Ave; 66 Pacific Ave; 95 High Park Ave; 102 Pacific Ave
Ward: Ward 4 · Gord Perks
Submitted: 23 October 2020
Status: NOAC Issued
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 764 units
Related file: 16 271597 WET 13 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

The proposed development would maintain the existing four rental buildings on the lands, while proposing to demolish two blocks of existing townhouses comprised of 20 total units, to accommodate three new rental buildings with 764 dwelling units at proposed building heights of 35, 11, and 30 stories.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

The Canada Life Assurance Company and Canadian Real Estate Investment Fund No.1 · registration SM29670
35, 41-63, 65 and 95 High Park Avenue and 66 and 102-116 Pacific Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29670: 35, 41-63, 65 and 95 High Park Avenue and 66 and 102-116 Pacific Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 210125 STE 04 SA at 41 High Park Ave: The proposed development would maintain the existing four rental buildings on the lands, while proposing to demolish two blocks of existing townhouses comprised of 20 total units, to accommodate three new rental buildings with 764 dwelling units at proposed building heights of 35, 11, and 30 storie… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 35, 41-63, 65 and 95 High Park Avenue and 66 and 102-116 Pacific Avenue
Matched fields
address
102-116 PACIFIC AVE
application_address
102 PACIFIC AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 4 Parkdale-High Park1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 4 Parkdale-High Park	Member of council	1	1	23 January 2020

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

GWL Realty Advisors Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4

17 lobbied · 33 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4: 17 lobbied and 33 matched unlobbied applications in 13 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	17	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	33	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.