lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 20 203471 ESC 20 OZ

50 Birchcliff Ave; 52 Birchcliff Ave; 1615 Kingston Rd; 1617 Kingston Rd; 1625-1641 Kingston Rd; 1647 Kingston Rd; 1649 Kingston Rd

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
6 October 2020
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
8
5 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
50 Birchcliff Ave; 52 Birchcliff Ave; 1615 Kingston Rd; 1617 Kingston Rd; 1625-1641 Kingston Rd; 1647 Kingston Rd; 1649 Kingston Rd
Ward
Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
Submitted
6 October 2020
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Redevelopment comprising of a 9-storey mixed-use building with commercial on the ground floor and residential above. A four storey standalong rental building is also proposed fronting Birchcliffe Avenue.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 8 communications · 5 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 20 Scarborough Southwest5
  • Gary Crawford3
Data table· 2 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 20 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council558 September 2020
Gary CrawfordCouncillor staff303 November 2020

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20

13 lobbied · 19 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20: 13 lobbied and 19 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied13Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied19Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.