Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 20 185654 NNY 08 SA

1886 Eglinton Ave W; 1890 Eglinton Ave W; 1892 Eglinton Ave W; 1894 Eglinton Ave W; 1896 Eglinton Ave W; 1898 Eglinton Ave W; 1902 Eglinton Ave W; 1902-1904 Eglinton Ave W; 1906 Eglinton Ave W; 1906-1908 Eglinton Ave W; 1910-1912 Eglinton Ave W; 1912 Eglinton Ave W; 1914 Eglinton Ave W; 1914-1918 Eglinton Ave W; 1916 Eglinton Ave W; 1920 A Eglinton Ave W; 1920 Eglinton Ave W; 1900 1/2 Eglinton Ave W

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: NOAC Issued; Approved
Submitted: 26 August 2020; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 1 meeting · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 1886 Eglinton Ave W; 1890 Eglinton Ave W; 1892 Eglinton Ave W; 1894 Eglinton Ave W; 1896 Eglinton Ave W; 1898 Eglinton Ave W; 1902 Eglinton Ave W; 1902-1904 Eglinton Ave W; 1906 Eglinton Ave W; 1906-1908 Eglinton Ave W; 1910-1912 Eglinton Ave W; 1912 Eglinton Ave W; 1914 Eglinton Ave W; 1914-1918 Eglinton Ave W; 1916 Eglinton Ave W; 1920 A Eglinton Ave W; 1920 Eglinton Ave W; 1900 1/2 Eglinton Ave W
Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted: 26 August 2020
Status: NOAC Issued
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 194 units; 14,208 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan application to permit the proposal for a 9 storey mixed use building. The proposal has a total gross floor area of 14,207.5 square metres. 194 residential units and 1,201 square metres of ground-floor retail are proposed. The proposal includes 87 underground vehicle parking spaces and 235 bicycle spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Clifton Blake Asset Management · registration SM28817
Minor Variance and Site Plan Amendment application for the site 1920-1924 Eglinton Avenue West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28817: Minor Variance and Site Plan Amendment application for the site 1920-1924 Eglinton Avenue West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 185654 NNY 08 SA at 1902 Eglinton Ave W: Site Plan application to permit the proposal for a 9 storey mixed use building. The proposal has a total gross floor area of 14,207.5 square metres. 194 residential units and 1,201 square metres of ground-floor retail are proposed. The proposal includes 87 underground vehicle parking spaces and 235… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor Variance and Site Plan Amendment application for the site 1920-1924 Eglinton Avenue West
Matched fields
address
1920-1924 EGLINTON AVE W
application_address
1920A EGLINTON AVE W

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 2 communications · 1 meeting · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Office of Councillor Colle, Ward 81
Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Office of Councillor Colle, Ward 8	Councillor staff	1	0	13 December 2019
Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence	Member of council	1	1	9 October 2019

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8

25 lobbied · 70 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied8%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8: 25 lobbied and 70 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	25	—	100% (n=3)	0%	8%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	70	727	100% (n=4)	0%	4%	0.00

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.