lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 20 158264 ESC 20 OZ

1891 Eglinton Ave E

Status
Appeal Received
In progress
Submitted
19 June 2020
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
14
3 meetings · 6 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
1891 Eglinton Ave E
Ward
Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
Submitted
19 June 2020
Status
Appeal Received
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
Yes
Related file
11 325706 ESC 35 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Official Plan Amendment application to add a new Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) for the northerly portion of the subject site to permit a mixed-use development with two new public streets and 2,196 sq. m public parkland. The application consists of four (4) buildings with heights that range from 12 to 48 storeys.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 14 communications · 3 meetings · 6 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Councillor Gary Crawford4
  • Toronto Water3
  • Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services2
  • Gary Crawford2
  • Councillor Michael Thompson1
  • Ward 20 Scarborough Southwest1
  • Gary Crawford1
Data table· 7 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Councillor Gary CrawfordCouncillor staff4023 February 2022
Toronto WaterCity staff3011 March 2024
Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure ServicesCity staff2011 March 2024
Gary CrawfordCouncillor staff2111 April 2023
Councillor Michael ThompsonCouncillor staff1027 June 2022
Ward 20 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1115 March 2022
Gary CrawfordMember of council119 March 2023

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20

13 lobbied · 19 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20: 13 lobbied and 19 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied13Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied19Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.