Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 20 152435 STE 10 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 4 June 2020
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Yonge St; 7 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 4 June 2020
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 13 129256 STE 10 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications to revise the approved OPA and ZBA as it relates to the southerly parcel (phase 4 and 5) to allow for the inclusion of a hotel use within Phase 4 of the redevelopment, as well as changes to the proposal other changes to building mass. There is an associated site plan application 21 245354 STE 10 SA
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Pinnacle International · registration SM34323
Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for proposed redevelopment located at 1-7 Yonge Street.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34323: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for proposed redevelopment located at 1-7 Yonge Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 152435 STE 10 OZ at 7 Yonge St: Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications to revise the approved OPA and ZBA as it relates to the southerly parcel (phase 4 and 5) to allow for the inclusion of a hotel use within Phase 4 of the redevelopment, as well as changes to the proposal other changes to building mass. There is … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for proposed redevelopment located at 1-7 Yonge Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 1-7 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 1 YONGE ST
Mondiale Development/Pinnacle International · registration SM32400
PATH Connection at 1-7 Yonge Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32400: PATH Connection at 1-7 Yonge Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 152435 STE 10 OZ at 7 Yonge St: Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications to revise the approved OPA and ZBA as it relates to the southerly parcel (phase 4 and 5) to allow for the inclusion of a hotel use within Phase 4 of the redevelopment, as well as changes to the proposal other changes to building mass. There is … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: PATH Connection at 1-7 Yonge Street
Matched fields
- address
- 1-7 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 1 YONGE ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 11 communications · 2 meetings · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transportation Services | City staff | 4 | 2 | 8 July 2022 |
| Ausma Malik | Member of council | 4 | 0 | 31 March 2026 |
| Ausma Malik | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 31 March 2026 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Pinnacle InternationalSM34316 · 27 March 2023 · “1 Yonge St”
- Pinnacle International (Seven Yonge) Ltd.SM26905 · 26 October 2018 · “7 Yonge Street”
- Pinnacle InternationalSM26093 · 20 April 2018 · “7 Yonge Street”
- Mondiale Development LTD.SM18725 · 5 December 2012 · “1 Yonge Street”
- Pinnacle Internation GroupSM18743 · 3 December 2012 · “1 Yonge Street”
- Pinnacle InternationalSM18737 · 30 November 2012 · “1 Yonge Street”
- Pinnacle InternationalSM18712 · 23 November 2012 · “1 Yonge Street”
- Osmington Inc.SM17882 · 8 March 2012 · “1 Yonge Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.