Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 20 151730 ESC 23 OZ

Ward 23 · Jamaal MyersDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 3 June 2020; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1571 Sandhurst Crcl
Ward: Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
Submitted: 3 June 2020
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 202,903 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Infill development on existing shopping mall parking area. The existing Woodside Square shopping mall is proposed to remain. Infill development comprises of 6 towers ranging from 22 to 33 storey heights and 2 mid-rise buildings with 12 storey heights. All buildings would be mixed-use. A total of 202,903 square metres of new gross floor area is proposed, including 189,715 square metres of residential GFA and a total of 2,555 residenitial units.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Woodside Investment Management Inc.
SM34270 · 2 March 2023 · “1571 Sandhurst Circle”
Woodside Investment Management Inc.
SM28899 · 24 September 2019 · “1571 Sandhurst Circle”
Woodside Investment Management Inc.
SM28900 · 24 September 2019 · “1571 Sandhurst Circle”
Woodside Investment Management Inc.
SM28819 · 5 September 2019 · “1571 Sandhurst Circle”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 23

2 lobbied · 2 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 23: 2 lobbied and 2 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.