Address · Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
1571 Sandhurst Crcl
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
- Location
- 43.80922, -79.26931
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Lai, Ward 23 | Councillor staff | 15 | 5 | 15 September 2020 |
| Ward 23 Scarborough North | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 5 May 2020 |
| Jamaal Myers | Councillor staff | 3 | 2 | 29 March 2023 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34270 | Woodside Investment Management Inc. | 1571 Sandhurst Circle | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 2 March 2023 – 3 April 2024 | 2 |
| SM28899 | Woodside Investment Management Inc. | 1571 Sandhurst Circle | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 24 September 2019 – 22 September 2021 | 5 |
| SM28900 | Woodside Investment Management Inc. | 1571 Sandhurst Circle | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 24 September 2019 – 5 March 2024 | 5 |
| SM28819 | Woodside Investment Management Inc. | 1571 Sandhurst Circle | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 5 September 2019 – 23 February 2023 | 10 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
9- Submitted 24 April 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0091/25SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 30 May 2024Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 24 156566 ESC 23 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 30 April 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 142261 ESC 23 OZUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 3 June 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 151730 ESC 23 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 9 March 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0063/20SCClosed · Refused
- Submitted 7 December 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 265948 ESC 23 SAFinal Approval Completed · Approved
- Submitted 5 December 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0368/18SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 November 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0351/18SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 2 November 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4480565Cancelled · Withdrawn
Data table· 9 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0091/25SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 24 April 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 24 156566 ESC 23 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 30 May 2024 | Under Review In progress |
| 24 142261 ESC 23 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 April 2024 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 151730 ESC 23 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 3 June 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0063/20SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 9 March 2020 | Closed Refused |
| 18 265948 ESC 23 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 7 December 2018 | Final Approval Completed Approved |
| A0368/18SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 5 December 2018 | Closed Approved |
| A0351/18SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 20 November 2018 | Closed Approved |
| COA-4480565 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 2 November 2018 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 23
3 lobbied · 32 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 32 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 23
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 23
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.