Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 20 146496 WET 03 SB
23 Park Lawn Rd; 2150 Lake Shore Blvd W; 2194 Lake Shore Blvd W
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 19 May 2020
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 23 Park Lawn Rd; 2150 Lake Shore Blvd W; 2194 Lake Shore Blvd W
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 19 May 2020
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 20 146488 WET 03 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Subdivision in order to establish development blocks and new streets (a total of 10 blocks).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- First capital RealtySM27650 · 14 February 2019 · “2150 Lake Shore Blvd West”
- First capital RealtySM27149 · 12 December 2018 · “2150 Lake Shore Boulevard West”
- First capital RealtySM27152 · 12 December 2018 · “2150 Lake Shore Boulevard West”
- First Capital Asset ManagementSM27308 · 10 December 2018 · “2150 Lake Shore Blvd West”
- First Capital Holdings Trust (Ontario) Inc.SM24560 · 12 May 2017 · “2150 Lake Shore Blvd West”
- First Capital Holdings Trust (Ontario) Inc.SM24560 · 12 May 2017 · “23 Park Lawn Road”
- First capital RealtySM23889 · 10 January 2017 · “2150 Lake Shore Blvd. West”
- The Rosethorn CompanySM23107 · 1 June 2016 · “2150 Lake Shore Blvd West”
- Kraft Canada Inc.SM14108 · 1 February 2010 · “2150 Lake Shore Blvd. W.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 3
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.