Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 20 108364 STE 12 CD

33 Holly St; 44 Dunfield Ave; 86 Soudan Ave; 88 Soudan Ave

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 24 January 2020; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 33 Holly St; 44 Dunfield Ave; 86 Soudan Ave; 88 Soudan Ave
Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted: 24 January 2020
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 545 units
Related file: 13 211324 STE 22 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft Plan of Standard Condominium to permit 545 residential units and 4 guest suites, within two new residential towers (Tower H: 27-storeys, 236 residential units, 2 guest suites; Tower D: 34-Storeys, 309 residential units, 2 guest suites), with a 3-level shared below-grade garage, on a lot retained through the severance of two lots occupied by two existing apartment buildings.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Plazacorp Investments Limited
SM26590 · 9 August 2018 · “33 Holly Street.”
Holly Dunfield Residences Corp.
SM26515 · 10 July 2018 · “33 Holly Street”
Bayfield Management Limited
SM19178 · 30 April 2013 · “33 Holly Street”
Law Offices of Jack Greenberg
SM19248 · 30 April 2013 · “33 Holly Street”
Compten Management Inc.
SM19251 · 30 April 2013 · “33 Holly Street”
Bayfield Management Limited
SM19178 · 30 April 2013 · “44 Dunfield Avenue”
Compten Management Inc.
SM19251 · 30 April 2013 · “44 Dunfield Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12

5 lobbied · 11 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12: 5 lobbied and 11 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	11	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.