lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 19 255712 WET 01 SA

57 Rexdale Blvd; 2200 Islington Ave; 2260 Islington Ave

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
29 November 2019
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
25
13 meetings · 17 offices

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
57 Rexdale Blvd; 2200 Islington Ave; 2260 Islington Ave
Ward
Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
Submitted
29 November 2019
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Related file
13 277902 WET 02 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

The development of new 1 to 2 storey commercial buildings and a gas bar supported by a two level parking structure for a portion of the site and surface level parking for the eastern portion of the site. There are three POPS along Rexdale Blvd. The proposal includes new streets and is tied to the Intersection realignment of Rexdale Blvd and Islington Ave. The warehouse buildings on the south portion of the property are to remain,

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 25 communications · 13 meetings · 17 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 2 Etobicoke North4
  • Vincent Crisanti4
  • Mayor3
  • City Legal1
  • Corporate Services1
  • Councillor Di Giorgio, Ward 121
  • Councillor Ford1
  • Councillor Ford, Ward 21
Data table· 17 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 2 Etobicoke NorthMember of council4317 July 2018
Vincent CrisantiMember of council4112 March 2024
MayorCouncillor staff3013 April 2022
City LegalCity staff106 April 2022
Corporate ServicesCity staff103 March 2021
Councillor Di Giorgio, Ward 12Councillor staff1119 April 2018
Councillor FordCouncillor staff1015 April 2021
Councillor Ford, Ward 2Councillor staff1118 April 2018
Office of Councillor Crisanti, Ward 1Councillor staff119 April 2018
Create TOLocal board103 March 2021
Ward 1 Etobicoke NorthMember of council119 April 2018
Ward 11 York South-WestonMember of council1118 April 2018
Ward 12 York South-WestonMember of council1119 April 2018
Ward 17 DavenportMember of council1118 April 2018
Ward 3 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1123 March 2018
Brad BradfordMember of council1111 December 2024
Olivia ChowMember of council1013 July 2023

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 1

4 lobbied · 12 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 1: 4 lobbied and 12 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied4Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied12Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.