Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 19 242909 NNY 16 SA

Ward 16 · Jon BurnsideDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: NOAC Issued; Approved
Submitted: 30 October 2019; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 2 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 1150 Eglinton Ave E
Ward: Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
Submitted: 30 October 2019
Status: NOAC Issued
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 16 236387 NNY 26 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

This is the first residential application (Block 12) for Site Plan Control related to the redevelopment of the former Celestica lands, now known as Crosstown. This application proposes the construction of three towers of 32, 34 and 39 storeys atop a podium ranging from 2 to 5 storeys, a portion of which is the retained facade of the Parkin Building. Also proposed on the site is an 8 storey mid-rise, and 18 three storey back-to-back townhouses. Eight if the 18 townhouses are proposed to be affordable ownership units. A POPS connection is proposed through the site, connecting further public Street C with Block 14B, which will be open space. An underground garage will accommodate 957 vehicle parking spaces and 7 care-shares spaces. 1,260 bicycle parking spaces are also proposed, as well as one bike share station.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Aspen Ridge Homes · registration SM27646
RE the development of 1150 Eglinton Ave. East and 844 Don Mills Rd.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27646: RE the development of 1150 Eglinton Ave. East and 844 Don Mills Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 242909 NNY 16 SA at 1150 Eglinton Ave E: This is the first residential application (Block 12) for Site Plan Control related to the redevelopment of the former Celestica lands, now known as Crosstown. This application proposes the construction of three towers of 32, 34 and 39 storeys atop a podium ranging from 2 to 5 storeys, a portion of … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: RE the development of 1150 Eglinton Ave. East and 844 Don Mills Rd.
Matched fields
address
1150 EGLINTON AVE E
application_address
1150 EGLINTON AVE E

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 16 Don Valley East2

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 16 Don Valley East	Member of council	2	2	6 May 2019

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Diamondcorp
SM24272 · 27 March 2017 · “1150 Eglinton Ave East.”
Whitecastle New Urban Fund 3
SM22668 · 15 January 2016 · “1150 Eglinton Avenue East”
Diamondcorp
SM21669 · 14 April 2015 · “1150 Eglinton Avenue East”
Diamondcorp
SM21606 · 29 March 2015 · “1150 Eglinton Avenue East.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16

10 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16: 10 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.