Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 19 232808 WET 02 CD
4208 Dundas St W; 4210 Dundas St W; 4214 Dundas St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 7 October 2019
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 4208 Dundas St W; 4210 Dundas St W; 4214 Dundas St W
- Ward
- Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
- Submitted
- 7 October 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 80 units
- Related file
- 16 270623 WET 04 SA
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
[Blocks 1 & 2 - Townhouses]. Draft Plan of Condominium application to establish a 3-storey stacked townhouse with 80 units. The development will contain 88 residential parking spaces and 12 residential visitor parking spaces.Related applications: Subdivision Approval 16 250552 WET 04 SB, Site Specific Zoning By-law Amendment to amend OPA (By-law No. 462-2017) and Site Specific Zoning By-law Amendment to amend Former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code (By-law No. 463-2017), Site Plan Control 16 270623 WET 04 SA (Phase 1 lands) and Site Plan Control 17 189038 WET 04 SA (Phase 2 lands).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Urban Capital Property GroupSM26497 · 17 July 2018 · “4208 Dundas Street West”
- Urban Capital PropertiesSM26498 · 17 July 2018 · “4208 Dundas Street West”
- Urban Capital Property GroupSM21674 · 15 April 2015 · “4208 Dundas Street West”
- Urban Capital Property GroupSM21660 · 13 April 2015 · “4208 Dundas Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 2
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.