lobbyTO

Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 19 232808 WET 02 CD

4208 Dundas St W; 4210 Dundas St W; 4214 Dundas St W

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
7 October 2019
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses
4208 Dundas St W; 4210 Dundas St W; 4214 Dundas St W
Ward
Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Submitted
7 October 2019
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
80 units
Related file
16 270623 WET 04 SA

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

[Blocks 1 & 2 - Townhouses]. Draft Plan of Condominium application to establish a 3-storey stacked townhouse with 80 units. The development will contain 88 residential parking spaces and 12 residential visitor parking spaces.Related applications: Subdivision Approval 16 250552 WET 04 SB, Site Specific Zoning By-law Amendment to amend OPA (By-law No. 462-2017) and Site Specific Zoning By-law Amendment to amend Former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code (By-law No. 463-2017), Site Plan Control 16 270623 WET 04 SA (Phase 1 lands) and Site Plan Control 17 189038 WET 04 SA (Phase 2 lands).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 2

1 lobbied · 1 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=3
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%
Data table· 4 rows
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 2: 1 lobbied and 1 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied28—100% (n=3)0%0%0.04
Matched, unlobbied95—100% (n=6)0%0%0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.