Address · Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
4208 Dundas St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
- Location
- 43.66051, -79.51153
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 18 July 2018 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM26497 | Urban Capital Property Group | 4208 Dundas Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 17 July 2018 – 18 July 2019 | 1 |
| SM26498 | Urban Capital Properties | 4208 Dundas Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 17 July 2018 – 18 July 2019 | 1 |
| SM21674 | Urban Capital Property Group | 4208 Dundas Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 15 April 2015 – 14 April 2016 | 0 |
| SM21660 | Urban Capital Property Group | 4208 Dundas Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 13 April 2015 – 31 December 2015 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
8- Submitted 21 June 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 173843 WET 02 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 7 October 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 232800 WET 02 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 7 October 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 232808 WET 02 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 7 October 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 232814 WET 02 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 June 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 189038 WET 04 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 270623 WET 04 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 November 2016Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 16 250552 WET 04 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 July 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 183631 WET 04 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 8 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 173843 WET 02 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 21 June 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 19 232800 WET 02 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 7 October 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 232808 WET 02 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 7 October 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 232814 WET 02 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 7 October 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 189038 WET 04 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 June 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 270623 WET 04 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 250552 WET 04 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 14 November 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 183631 WET 04 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 2 July 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
4210 Dundas St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 183631 WET 04 OZ · submitted 2 July 2014 · Closed · from registration SM21660 (Urban Capital Property Group)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM21660: Ongoing discussions with City of Etobicoke approval agencies toward the resolution of a Zoning By- Law Application (ZBA)/Official Plan Amendment(OPA) application for 4208 Dundas Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 183631 WET 04 OZ at 4210 Dundas St W: This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit a mixed use development at 4208, 4210 and 4214 Dundas Street West. The development would include an 8-storey (35 metre) mixed use building fronting onto Dundas Street West, 3-storey (13 metre) st… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …roval agencies toward the resolution of a Zoning By- Law Application (ZBA)/Official Plan Amendment(OPA) application for 4208 Dundas Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 4208 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 4208 DUNDAS ST W
4210 Dundas St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 183631 WET 04 OZ · submitted 2 July 2014 · Closed · from registration SM21674 (Urban Capital Property Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21674: Application for rezoning lands located at 4208 Dundas Street West Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 183631 WET 04 OZ at 4210 Dundas St W: This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit a mixed use development at 4208, 4210 and 4214 Dundas Street West. The development would include an 8-storey (35 metre) mixed use building fronting onto Dundas Street West, 3-storey (13 metre) st… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application for rezoning lands located at 4208 Dundas Street West Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 4208 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 4208 DUNDAS ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 2
5 lobbied · 15 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 2
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2
9 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.