Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 19 177157 STE 10 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 24 June 2019
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 85 Hanna Ave
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 24 June 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 18 264755 STE 10 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
A site plan application that proposes a six-storey addition atop an existing four-storey commercial office building (11,525.0 square metres of nonresidential GFA).
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
First Capital REIT · registration SM29707
Toronto/Metrolinx bridge to connect 1100 King St. W Toronto ON, M6K 0C6 to 85 Hanna Avenue, Toronto ON, M6K 3S3.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29707: Toronto/Metrolinx bridge to connect 1100 King St. W Toronto ON, M6K 0C6 to 85 Hanna Avenue, Toronto ON, M6K 3S3. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 177157 STE 10 SA at 85 Hanna Ave: A site plan application that proposes a six-storey addition atop an existing four-storey commercial office building (11,525.0 square metres of nonresidential GFA). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Toronto/Metrolinx bridge to connect 1100 King St. W Toronto ON, M6K 0C6 to 85 Hanna Avenue, Toronto ON, M6K 3S3.
Matched fields
- address
- 85 HANNA AVE
- application_address
- 85 HANNA AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 5 communications · 0 meetings · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 27 February 2020 |
| Councillor Stephen Holyday | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 15 April 2020 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- First capital RealtySM27571 · 5 February 2019 · “85 Hanna Avenue.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.