Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 19 148964 STE 10 SA
285 Dufferin St; 1174 King St W; 1178 King St W; 1182 King St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 3 May 2019
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 285 Dufferin St; 1174 King St W; 1178 King St W; 1182 King St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 3 May 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 15 193651 STE 14 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal for a 17-storey building with commercial uses at-grade and residential uses on the upper floors. This application is associated with rezoning application 15-193651 STE 04 OZ, which also includes the property at 1221 King Street West, which is under separate review for a 14-storey mixed-use building under site plan control application 18-264285 STE 04 SA.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
New Rock Consultants Inc. · registration SM29394
proposed development at 1221 and 1182 King Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29394: proposed development at 1221 and 1182 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 148964 STE 10 SA at 1182 King St W: Proposal for a 17-storey building with commercial uses at-grade and residential uses on the upper floors. This application is associated with rezoning application 15-193651 STE 04 OZ, which also includes the property at 1221 King Street West, which is under separate review for a 14-storey mixed-use… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: proposed development at 1221 and 1182 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 1182 KING ST W
- application_address
- 1182 KING ST W
Lifetime Developments · registration SM20696
1182-1221 King Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20696: 1182-1221 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 148964 STE 10 SA at 1182 King St W: Proposal for a 17-storey building with commercial uses at-grade and residential uses on the upper floors. This application is associated with rezoning application 15-193651 STE 04 OZ, which also includes the property at 1221 King Street West, which is under separate review for a 14-storey mixed-use… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1182-1221 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 1182-1221 KING ST W
- application_address
- 1182 KING ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 17 July 2014 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.