Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 19 147116 STE 09 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 30 April 2019
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 1245 Dupont St
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 30 April 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 16 231334 STE 18 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
BLOCK 6 of the Galleria Devlopment together with part of City Park Lands: Site Plan Control Application. Proposed community centre that will replace existing Wallace Emerson Community Centre.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
ELADCANADA · registration SM28466
Galleria Mall - 1245 Dupont Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28466: Galleria Mall - 1245 Dupont Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 147116 STE 09 SA at 1245 Dupont St: BLOCK 6 of the Galleria Devlopment together with part of City Park Lands: Site Plan Control Application. Proposed community centre that will replace existing Wallace Emerson Community Centre. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Galleria Mall - 1245 Dupont Street
Matched fields
- address
- 1245 DUPONT ST
- application_address
- 1245 DUPONT ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 20 January 2021 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- ELADCANADASM28557 · 9 July 2019 · “1245 Dupont Street”
- ELADCANADASM28465 · 20 June 2019 · “1245 Dupont Street”
- Rice Commercial Group LimitedSM19884 · 26 November 2013 · “1245 Dupont St.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.