Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 18 269720 WTE 09 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 18 December 2018
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 383 Old Weston Rd
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 18 December 2018
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 276 units
- Related file
- 18 135955 WET 17 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
To construct six new buildings, including five low-rise blocks of stacked 3.5-storey townhouses on the Old Weston Road lands and an 11-storey mixed use building (with retail at-grade) on the St. Clair Avenue West lands. A total of 276 residential units are proposed, of which 96 would be townhouse units and 180 would be within the mixed use building. Of the 96 townhouse units, 20 would be affordable ownership units in partnership with Habitat for Humanity. May 13, 2019 - this circulation includes additional materials (Architectural Plans and TGS Checklist).
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Diamond Corp · registration SM25950
1800-1818 St. Clair Ave. W. & 383-425 Old Weston Rd.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25950: 1800-1818 St. Clair Ave. W. & 383-425 Old Weston Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 269720 WTE 09 SA at 383 Old Weston Rd: To construct six new buildings, including five low-rise blocks of stacked 3.5-storey townhouses on the Old Weston Road lands and an 11-storey mixed use building (with retail at-grade) on the St. Clair Avenue West lands. A total of 276 residential units are proposed, of which 96 would be townhouse u… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1800-1818 St. Clair Ave. W. & 383-425 Old Weston Rd.
- particulars: 1800-1818 St. Clair Ave. W. & 383-425 Old Weston Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 383-425 OLD WESTON RD
- application_address
- 383 OLD WESTON RD
Diamondcorp · registration SM25790
1800-1818 St. Clair Ave. W. & 383-425 Old Weston Rd.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25790: 1800-1818 St. Clair Ave. W. & 383-425 Old Weston Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 269720 WTE 09 SA at 383 Old Weston Rd: To construct six new buildings, including five low-rise blocks of stacked 3.5-storey townhouses on the Old Weston Road lands and an 11-storey mixed use building (with retail at-grade) on the St. Clair Avenue West lands. A total of 276 residential units are proposed, of which 96 would be townhouse u… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1800-1818 St. Clair Ave. W. & 383-425 Old Weston Rd.
- particulars: 1800-1818 St. Clair Ave. W. & 383-425 Old Weston Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 383-425 OLD WESTON RD
- application_address
- 383 OLD WESTON RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 47 communications · 8 meetings · 7 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 7 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Palacio Office | Councillor staff | 20 | 1 | 9 October 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Bailao, Ward 9 | Councillor staff | 14 | 0 | 19 September 2019 |
| Ward 17 Davenport | Member of council | 7 | 3 | 9 October 2018 |
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 17 September 2019 |
| Councillor Palacio | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 19 March 2018 |
| Councillor Palacio's Office | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 29 May 2018 |
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 16 November 2018 |
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.