lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 18 263980 STE 11 SA

70 Centre Ave; 137 Edward St; 210 Dundas St W; 465 University Ave; 481 University Ave

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
3 December 2018
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
70 Centre Ave; 137 Edward St; 210 Dundas St W; 465 University Ave; 481 University Ave
Ward
Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted
3 December 2018
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
709 units
Related file
13 123864 STE 27 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Control Application to facilitate the addition of a 52-storey (178.4 metres) mixed use building containing 20,782 square metres of office space, 3,605 square metres of retail space, and 709 residential dwelling units. A new interior entrance to St. Patrick subway station is proposed as part of the development. Portions of the existing buildings at 481 University Avenue and 210 Dundas Street West would be retained as part of the development. A total of 191 below grade parking spaces and 654 bicycle parking spaces are proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11

46 lobbied · 113 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied1,629

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=2
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=12

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied9%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11: 46 lobbied and 113 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied46—100% (n=2)0%9%0.09
Matched, unlobbied1131,629100% (n=12)0%2%0.02
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.