Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
481 University Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.65521, -79.38796
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
6These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Mike Layton | Councillor staff | 7 | 0 | 28 June 2022 |
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 18 October 2012 |
| Ward 11 University-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 19 April 2022 |
All registrations· 6 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33413 | Davpart Inc. | 481 University Avenue | Planning and Development Application; Real Estate / Property (City-owned) | 28 June 2022 – 11 April 2023 | 0 |
| SM33151 | Davpart Inc. | 481 University Ave. | Planning and Development Application; Real Estate / Property (City-owned) | 11 April 2022 – 11 April 2023 | 8 |
| SM18566 | B+H Architects | 481 University Ave. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 18 October 2012 – 18 October 2012 | 0 |
| SM18567 | B+H Architects | 481 University Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 18 October 2012 – 18 October 2014 | 1 |
| SM17890 | B+H Architects | 481 University Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 12 March 2012 – 12 December 2014 | 1 |
| SM17891 | B+H Architects | 481 University Ave | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 12 March 2012 – 12 September 2012 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 5 December 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1339/22TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 22 August 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0925/19TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 3 December 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 263980 STE 11 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 February 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 123864 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1339/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 5 December 2022 | Closed Approved |
| A0925/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 22 August 2019 | Closed Approved |
| 18 263980 STE 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 3 December 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 123864 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 February 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
481 University Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 123864 STE 27 OZ · submitted 22 February 2013 · Closed · from registration SM17890 (B+H Architects)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17890: Working as a consultant for the architect for 481 University Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 123864 STE 27 OZ at 481 University Ave: Rezoning application to permit the re-development of the lands for the purposes of a new mixed use building, 55 stories in height complete with 50,439m2 (748 units) of residential space, 3,055m2 of retail space and 22,488m2 of office space. This proposal includes a total of 378 parking spaces all o… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Working as a consultant for the architect for 481 University Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 481 UNIVERSITY AVE
- application_address
- 481 UNIVERSITY AVE
481 University Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 123864 STE 27 OZ · submitted 22 February 2013 · Closed · from registration SM18567 (B+H Architects)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18567: 481 University Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 123864 STE 27 OZ at 481 University Ave: Rezoning application to permit the re-development of the lands for the purposes of a new mixed use building, 55 stories in height complete with 50,439m2 (748 units) of residential space, 3,055m2 of retail space and 22,488m2 of office space. This proposal includes a total of 378 parking spaces all o… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 481 University Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 481 UNIVERSITY AVE
- application_address
- 481 UNIVERSITY AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 11
16 lobbied · 354 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 354 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | 1,629 | 100% (n=12) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.