Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 18 259789 WET 17 SA
855 St Clair Ave W; 861 St Clair Ave W; 863 St Clair Ave W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 22 November 2018
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 855 St Clair Ave W; 861 St Clair Ave W; 863 St Clair Ave W
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 22 November 2018
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 76 units; 6,619 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Control application for proposed 10-storey mixed-use building containing 76 residential condominium units with retail at-grade. The proposed building would have a total residential gross floor area of 6,619 m² and a total retail gross floor area of 259 m². A total of 57 parking spaces would be provided through two levels of below-grade parking.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Malen Capital Corporation · registration SM26344
Applications in support of 861 & 863 St. Clair Avenue West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26344: Applications in support of 861 & 863 St. Clair Avenue West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 259789 WET 17 SA at 863 St Clair Ave W: Site Plan Control application for proposed 10-storey mixed-use building containing 76 residential condominium units with retail at-grade. The proposed building would have a total residential gross floor area of 6,619 m² and a total retail gross floor area of 259 m². A total of 57 parking spaces wou… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications in support of 861 & 863 St. Clair Avenue West
Matched fields
- address
- 861&863 ST CLAIR AVE W
- application_address
- 861 ST CLAIR AVE W
2558961 Ontario Ltd · registration SM26302
to obtain City Site plan approvals and variances through the Committee of Adjustment for the proposed mixed use development at 861-863 St Clair Ave W
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM26302: to obtain City Site plan approvals and variances through the Committee of Adjustment for the proposed mixed use development at 861-863 St Clair Ave W (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 259789 WET 17 SA at 863 St Clair Ave W: Site Plan Control application for proposed 10-storey mixed-use building containing 76 residential condominium units with retail at-grade. The proposed building would have a total residential gross floor area of 6,619 m² and a total retail gross floor area of 259 m². A total of 57 parking spaces wou… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …in City Site plan approvals and variances through the Committee of Adjustment for the proposed mixed use development at 861-863 St Clair Ave W
Matched fields
- address
- 861-863 ST CLAIR AVE W
- application_address
- 861 ST CLAIR AVE W
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 47 communications · 6 meetings · 6 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 6 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Bailao | Councillor staff | 22 | 1 | 6 May 2020 |
| Ward 21 St. Paul's | Member of council | 13 | 3 | 15 November 2018 |
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 8 | 0 | 24 June 2020 |
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 14 November 2018 |
| Office of the Chief Building Official | City staff | 1 | 0 | 2 September 2019 |
| Toronto Building | City staff | 1 | 0 | 4 September 2019 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.