Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 18 225642 STE 20 OZ

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 14 September 2018; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 0 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 578 King St W; 580 King St W
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 14 September 2018
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Revised Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the subject site with a 9-storey office building having a height of 41.1 metres (including the Mechanical Penthouse), which will also include commercial uses within a 2-storey base element that retains the existing heritage building. The total proposed gross floor area is approximately 4, 931.5 square metres.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

C Squared Properties 580 King Inc. · registration SM27727
578-580 King Street West -- Rezoning Application
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27727: 578-580 King Street West -- Rezoning Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 225642 STE 20 OZ at 578 King St W: Revised Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the subject site with a 9-storey office building having a height of 41.1 metres (including the Mechanical Penthouse), which will also include commercial uses within a 2-storey base element that retains the existing herit… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 578-580 King Street West -- Rezoning Application
Matched fields
address
578-580 KING ST W
application_address
578 KING ST W
C Squared Properties 580 King Inc. · registration SM26198
580 King St West, Toronto: seeking an amendment to existing zoning by-law to build a new retail-office building maintaining the heritage facade.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26198: 580 King St West, Toronto: seeking an amendment to existing zoning by-law to build a new retail-office building maintaining the heritage facade. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 225642 STE 20 OZ at 578 King St W: Revised Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the subject site with a 9-storey office building having a height of 41.1 metres (including the Mechanical Penthouse), which will also include commercial uses within a 2-storey base element that retains the existing herit… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 580 King St West, Toronto: seeking an amendment to existing zoning by-law to build a new retail-office building maintaining the heritage…
Matched fields
address
580 KING ST W
application_address
580 KING ST W

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 1 communication · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York	Member of council	1	0	26 February 2019

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Goodmans LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	10%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=7)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.