Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 18 185562 NNY 15 OZ

278 Hillmount Ave; 280 Hillmount Ave; 282 Hillmount Ave; 556 Marlee Ave; 831 Glencairn Ave; 833 Glencairn Ave; 837 Glencairn Ave

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 27 June 2018; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 4; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 278 Hillmount Ave; 280 Hillmount Ave; 282 Hillmount Ave; 556 Marlee Ave; 831 Glencairn Ave; 833 Glencairn Ave; 837 Glencairn Ave
Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted: 27 June 2018
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 218 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Rezoning application to allow a 10-storey mid-rise, mixed use building. Proposed development would include 218 dwelling units, including 2 live work units and ground floor retail. Underground parking would be provided. A total of 190 vehicle spaces and 218 bicycle spaces are proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Orion Realty Corporation · registration SM27912
Discuss the project at 831 Glencairn Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27912: Discuss the project at 831 Glencairn Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 185562 NNY 15 OZ at 831 Glencairn Ave: Rezoning application to allow a 10-storey mid-rise, mixed use building. Proposed development would include 218 dwelling units, including 2 live work units and ground floor retail. Underground parking would be provided. A total of 190 vehicle spaces and 218 bicycle spaces are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Discuss the project at 831 Glencairn Avenue
Matched fields
address
831 GLENCAIRN AVE
application_address
831 GLENCAIRN AVE
Chestnut Hill Developments · registration SM25384
Supporting redevelopment of 831, 833 and 837 Glencairn Avenue in Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25384: Supporting redevelopment of 831, 833 and 837 Glencairn Avenue in Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 185562 NNY 15 OZ at 831 Glencairn Ave: Rezoning application to allow a 10-storey mid-rise, mixed use building. Proposed development would include 218 dwelling units, including 2 live work units and ground floor retail. Underground parking would be provided. A total of 190 vehicle spaces and 218 bicycle spaces are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Supporting redevelopment of 831, 833 and 837 Glencairn Avenue in Toronto
Matched fields
address
837 GLENCAIRN AVE
application_address
837 GLENCAIRN AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 4 communications · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Councillor Colle4

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Councillor Colle	Councillor staff	4	1	7 December 2017

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Amir Remtulla and Associates1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Masseto Homes Inc.
SM24897 · 21 July 2017 · “837 Glencairn Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=2
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	33	—	100% (n=2)	0%	12%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	57	—	100% (n=3)	0%	27%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.