lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 18 149422 STE 30 OZ

1151 Queen St E

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
26 April 2018
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
112
0 meetings · 5 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
1151 Queen St E
Ward
Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
Submitted
26 April 2018
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
47 units; 3,554 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 6-storey mixed-use building containing 47 rental dwelling units with approximately 360 square metres of retail at grade and 3554square metres of residential gross floor area.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 112 communications · 0 meetings · 5 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Office of Councillor Fletcher, Ward 1488
  • Paula Fletcher15
  • Ward 14 Toronto-Danforth4
  • Paula Fletcher3
  • Councillor Fletcher, Ward 141
  • Office of Councillor Fletcher, Ward 14Ward1
Data table· 6 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Office of Councillor Fletcher, Ward 14Councillor staff8807 September 2022
Paula FletcherCouncillor staff15013 December 2023
Ward 14 Toronto-DanforthMember of council406 September 2022
Paula FletcherMember of council3013 December 2023
Councillor Fletcher, Ward 14Councillor staff1027 October 2020
Office of Councillor Fletcher, Ward 14WardCouncillor staff1013 July 2020

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14

18 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14: 18 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 14 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied18Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied28Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.