Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 18 139405 STE 28 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 6 April 2018
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 141 Bay St
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 6 April 2018
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 15 208844 STE 28 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Application to lift the holding provision respecting By-law 1104-2016
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Ivanhoe Cambridge · registration SM22431
45 Bay Street Site Plan Application, 141 Bay Street Rezoning, Combined Imagination, Manufacturing, Technology (IMIT) Incentive Program application.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22431: 45 Bay Street Site Plan Application, 141 Bay Street Rezoning, Combined Imagination, Manufacturing, Technology (IMIT) Incentive Program application. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 139405 STE 28 OZ at 141 Bay St: Application to lift the holding provision respecting By-law 1104-2016 (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 45 Bay Street Site Plan Application, 141 Bay Street Rezoning, Combined Imagination, Manufacturing, Technology (IMIT) Incentive Program application.
Matched fields
- address
- 141 BAY ST
- application_address
- 141 BAY ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 21 September 2016 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 141 Bay Street ULCSM25419 · 11 December 2017 · “141 Bay Street”
- 141 Bay Street ULCSM25422 · 11 December 2017 · “141 Bay Street”
- 141 Bay Street ULCSM25427 · 11 December 2017 · “141 Bay Street”
- Ivanhoe CambridgeSM22961 · 1 April 2016 · “141 Bay Street”
- Ivanhoe CambridgeSM22507 · 16 November 2015 · “141 Bay Street”
- Ivanhoe CambridgeSM22393 · 29 October 2015 · “141 Bay Street”
- Ivanhoe CambridgeSM21032 · 13 November 2014 · “141 Bay Street”
- Ivanhoe CambridgeSM20452 · 15 May 2014 · “141 Bay Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.