Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 18 136695 STE 28 OZ
80 B Power St; 80 Power St; 90 Power St; 92 Power St; 94 Power St; 161 Parliament St; 167 Parliament St; 351 Queen St E; 363 Queen St E; 371 Queen St E; 373 Queen St E
- Status
- OMB Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 29 March 2018
- Appealed
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 80 B Power St; 80 Power St; 90 Power St; 92 Power St; 94 Power St; 161 Parliament St; 167 Parliament St; 351 Queen St E; 363 Queen St E; 371 Queen St E; 373 Queen St E
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 29 March 2018
- Status
- OMB Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the development of a residential/mixed-use building
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
ONE Properties · registration SM25987
Application in support of redevelopment of 351-363 Queen St. E., 167 Parliament St. & 89 Power St.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25987: Application in support of redevelopment of 351-363 Queen St. E., 167 Parliament St. & 89 Power St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 136695 STE 28 OZ at 161 Parliament St: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the development of a residential/mixed-use building (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application in support of redevelopment of 351-363 Queen St. E., 167 Parliament St. & 89 Power St.
Matched fields
- address
- 351-363 QUEEN ST E
- application_address
- 351 QUEEN ST E
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 6 April 2018 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.