Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 18 125163 STE 20 OZ

1 Morrison St; 7 Morrison St; 9 Morrison St; 540 King St W; 544 King St W

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 6 March 2018; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1 Morrison St; 7 Morrison St; 9 Morrison St; 540 King St W; 544 King St W
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 6 March 2018
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the redevelopment of the site with a mixed-use building comprised of 12 storeys fronting King Street West containing ground floor retail and office uses above, and a 15-storey residential building fronting Morrison Street. The total height of both portions of the building will be 50 metres, including mechanical elements. Loading access will be off of a public lane north of the site and vehicular access to a below grade garage will be off of Brant Street.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Allied REIT · registration SM30493
ZBA & SPA Submissions for 540-544 King Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30493: ZBA & SPA Submissions for 540-544 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 125163 STE 20 OZ at 544 King St W: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the redevelopment of the site with a mixed-use building comprised of 12 storeys fronting King Street West containing ground floor retail and office uses above, and a 15-storey residential building fronting Morrison Street. The total height of both porti… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA & SPA Submissions for 540-544 King Street West
Matched fields
address
540-544 KING ST W
application_address
540 KING ST W
Allied REIT · registration SM25603
ZBA submission for 540-544 King Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25603: ZBA submission for 540-544 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 125163 STE 20 OZ at 544 King St W: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the redevelopment of the site with a mixed-use building comprised of 12 storeys fronting King Street West containing ground floor retail and office uses above, and a 15-storey residential building fronting Morrison Street. The total height of both porti… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA submission for 540-544 King Street West
Matched fields
address
540-544 KING ST W
application_address
540 KING ST W

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Great Gulf Group of Companies
SM22141 · 19 August 2015 · “540 King Street West”
Allied Properties REIT
SM12247 · 11 September 2008 · “544 King Street West”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	11%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=6)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.