lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 17 271641 WET 07 OZ

4 St. Gaspar Crt; 6 St. Gaspar Crt; 8 St. Gaspar Crt; 10 St. Gaspar Crt; 12 St. Gaspar Crt; 14 St. Gaspar Crt; 16 St. Gaspar Crt; 18 Antonio Crt; 18 St. Gaspar Crt; 20 St. Gaspar Crt; 22 St. Gaspar Crt; 24 St. Gaspar Crt; 26 St. Gaspar Crt; 28 St. Gaspar Crt; 30 St. Gaspar Crt; 109 Plunkett Rd; 111 Plunkett Rd; 113 Plunkett Rd; 115 Plunkett Rd; 117 Plunkett Rd; 119 Plunkett Rd; 121 Plunkett Rd; 123 Plunkett Rd; 125 Plunkett Rd; 127 Plunkett Rd; 129 Plunkett Rd; 131 Plunkett Rd; 133 Plunkett Rd; 135 Plunkett Rd; 137 Plunkett Rd; 139 Plunkett Rd

Status
Council Approved
Approved
Submitted
5 December 2017
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
4 St. Gaspar Crt; 6 St. Gaspar Crt; 8 St. Gaspar Crt; 10 St. Gaspar Crt; 12 St. Gaspar Crt; 14 St. Gaspar Crt; 16 St. Gaspar Crt; 18 Antonio Crt; 18 St. Gaspar Crt; 20 St. Gaspar Crt; 22 St. Gaspar Crt; 24 St. Gaspar Crt; 26 St. Gaspar Crt; 28 St. Gaspar Crt; 30 St. Gaspar Crt; 109 Plunkett Rd; 111 Plunkett Rd; 113 Plunkett Rd; 115 Plunkett Rd; 117 Plunkett Rd; 119 Plunkett Rd; 121 Plunkett Rd; 123 Plunkett Rd; 125 Plunkett Rd; 127 Plunkett Rd; 129 Plunkett Rd; 131 Plunkett Rd; 133 Plunkett Rd; 135 Plunkett Rd; 137 Plunkett Rd; 139 Plunkett Rd
Ward
Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
Submitted
5 December 2017
Status
Council Approved
Outcome recorded
Approved
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
151 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

The proposal is for six blocks of stacked, back-to-back townhouses containing 151 units

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7

7 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7: 7 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 7 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied7Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied8Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.