Address · Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
135 Plunkett Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
- Location
- 43.76241, -79.57002
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 12 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Colle | Councillor staff | 4 | 2 | 24 May 2024 |
| Ward 7 York West | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 19 July 2017 |
| Olivia Chow | Councillor staff | 2 | 1 | 23 May 2024 |
| Office of Councillor Mammoliti, Ward 7 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 19 July 2017 |
| Anthony Perruzza | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 23 May 2024 |
| Brad Bradford | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 23 May 2024 |
| Jennifer McKelvie | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 22 May 2024 |
| Jon Burnside | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 21 May 2024 |
| Jon Burnside | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 21 May 2024 |
| Josh Matlow | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 22 May 2024 |
| Parthi Kandavel | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 21 May 2024 |
| Parthi Kandavel | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 21 May 2024 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35614 | St. Gaspar's Development Corp. | 135 Plunkett Road | Affordable Housing; Economic Development; Planning and Development | 21 May 2024 – 6 November 2024 | 14 |
| SM35588 | Pauline Centre Corp | 135 PLUNKETT ROAD | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 14 May 2024 – 31 May 2024 | 0 |
| SM24603 | Luxor Homes | 135 Plunkett Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 23 May 2017 – 1 January 2020 | 3 |
| SM24470 | Luxor Realty Inc. | 135 Plunkett Rd. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Plan of … | 4 May 2017 – 4 November 2019 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
7- Submitted 18 August 2025Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 25 212507 WET 07 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 18 September 2023Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 23 203652 WET 07 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
- Submitted 24 April 2023Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 23 137324 WET 07 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 5 December 2017Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 17 271636 WET 07 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 5 December 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 271641 WET 07 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 3 May 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 162096 WET 07 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 3 May 2013Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 13 162112 WET 07 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 7 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 212507 WET 07 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 18 August 2025 | Under Review In progress |
| 23 203652 WET 07 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 September 2023 | OMB Appeal In progress |
| 23 137324 WET 07 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 24 April 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 271636 WET 07 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 5 December 2017 | Under Review In progress |
| 17 271641 WET 07 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 5 December 2017 | Council Approved Approved |
| 13 162096 WET 07 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 3 May 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 162112 WET 07 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 3 May 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
135 Plunkett Rd · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
17 271636 WET 07 SB · submitted 5 December 2017 · Under Review · from registration SM24470 (Luxor Realty Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24470: Application in support of redevelopment of 135 Plunkett Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 271636 WET 07 SB at 135 Plunkett Rd: Draft Plan of Subdivision to permit the development of 16 new residential lots (15 pairs of semi-detached dwellings and 1 detached dwelling). The new dwellings would be three-storeys in height. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application in support of redevelopment of 135 Plunkett Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 135 PLUNKETT RD
- application_address
- 135 PLUNKETT RD
135 Plunkett Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 162096 WET 07 OZ · submitted 3 May 2013 · Closed · from registration SM24681 (St. Gaspar's Developments)
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24681: DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATION: 13 162112 WET 07 SB ZONING BYLAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION: 13 162096 WET07 OZ 111 Plunkett Road, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 162096 WET 07 OZ at 135 Plunkett Rd: Proposed amendments to the City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 to permit the development of 21 residential semidetached buildings (42 dwellings). See folder 13 162112 WET 07 SB for related subdivision application. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATION: 13 162112 WET 07 SB ZONING BYLAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION: 13 162096 WET07 OZ 111 Plunkett Road, Toronto
Matched fields
- file_number
- 13 162096 WET 07 OZ
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
135 Plunkett Rd · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
13 162112 WET 07 SB · submitted 3 May 2013 · Closed · from registration SM24681 (St. Gaspar's Developments)
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24681: DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATION: 13 162112 WET 07 SB ZONING BYLAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION: 13 162096 WET07 OZ 111 Plunkett Road, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 162112 WET 07 SB at 135 Plunkett Rd: Draft Plan of Subdivision to permit the development of 21 residential semidetached buildings (42 dwellings). See folder 13 162096 WET 07 OZ for related rezoning application. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATION: 13 162112 WET 07 SB ZONING BYLAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION: 13 162096 WET07 OZ 111 Plunkett Road, Toronto
Matched fields
- file_number
- 13 162112 WET 07 SB
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 7
5 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7
7 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 7
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.