lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 17 266470 STE 29 OZ

2 Mortimer Ave; 4 Mortimer Ave; 995 Broadview Ave; 999 Broadview Ave; 1001 Broadview Ave; 1003 Broadview Ave; 1005 Broadview Ave

Ward 14 · Paula FletcherDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
23 November 2017
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
4
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
7
5 meetings · 4 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
2 Mortimer Ave; 4 Mortimer Ave; 995 Broadview Ave; 999 Broadview Ave; 1001 Broadview Ave; 1003 Broadview Ave; 1005 Broadview Ave
Ward
Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
Submitted
23 November 2017
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
50 units; 5,260 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 7-storey mixed use building: 50 dwelling units, height 24.2 metres, 5260 square metres of residential gross floor area and 409 square metres of retail space on the ground floor

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

4 linked registrations · 7 communications · 5 meetings · 4 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth4
  • Legal Services1
  • Councillor Fragedakis1
  • Office of Councillor Fragedakis, Ward 291
Data table· 4 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 29 Toronto-DanforthMember of council4220 February 2018
Legal ServicesCity staff1114 February 2018
Councillor FragedakisCouncillor staff1114 February 2018
Office of Councillor Fragedakis, Ward 29Councillor staff1114 February 2018

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14

18 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14: 18 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 14 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied18Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied28Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.