Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 17 262422 WET 07 OZ

Ward 7 · Anthony PerruzzaDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 14 November 2017; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 2370 Finch Ave W
Ward: Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
Submitted: 14 November 2017
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Amendments to the Emery Village Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law for a 11-storey mixed use condominium building and an 6-storey mixed use seniors building.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

HS4 Finch Investments Inc. · registration SM27042
Review of in-process planning application for development of condominium residential building at 2370 Finch Ave. W. Toronto.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM27042: Review of in-process planning application for development of condominium residential building at 2370 Finch Ave. W. Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 262422 WET 07 OZ at 2370 Finch Ave W: Amendments to the Emery Village Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law for a 11-storey mixed use condominium building and an 6-storey mixed use seniors building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Review of in-process planning application for development of condominium residential building at 2370 Finch Ave. W. Toronto.
Matched fields
address
2370 FINCH AVE W
application_address
2370 FINCH AVE W
HS4 Finch Investments Inc. · registration SM26433
Applications for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment for property located at 2370 Finch Avenue West. Seeking permissions to develop a mixed-use building of 268 residential units, including a se…
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM26433: Applications for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment for property located at 2370 Finch Avenue West. Seeking permissions to develop a mixed-use building of 268 residential units, including a seniors component of 59 units. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 262422 WET 07 OZ at 2370 Finch Ave W: Amendments to the Emery Village Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law for a 11-storey mixed use condominium building and an 6-storey mixed use seniors building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment for property located at 2370 Finch Avenue West. Seeking permissions to develop a mixed-use building of 268 residential units, including a seniors component of 59 units…
Matched fields
address
2370 FINCH AVE W
application_address
2370 FINCH AVE W

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Weston Consulting2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

J D Shah
SM29928 · 26 March 2020 · “2370 Finch Avenue West”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7

7 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7: 7 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 7 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.