Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 17 241044 STE 27 OZ

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 29 September 2017; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 5; 5 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 155 Wellesley St E
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 29 September 2017
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 3 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Applications for Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental HousingDemolition proposing the expansion and conversion of the first two storeys of an existing 18-storey, 116 unit residential rental apartment building to permit a two-storey medical facility andretail pharmacy. Alterations are also proposed to the existing ground floor rental office,corridors and storage rooms to facilitate the proposed uses. The application also proposes theremoval of 3 residential rental units on the ground floor.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Starlight Group Property Holdings Inc. · registration SM24716
Applications in support of redevelopment of 155 Wellesley St. E.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24716: Applications in support of redevelopment of 155 Wellesley St. E. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 241044 STE 27 OZ at 155 Wellesley St E: Applications for Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental HousingDemolition proposing the expansion and conversion of the first two storeys of an existing 18-storey, 116 unit residential rental apartment building to permit a two-storey medical facility andretail pharmacy. Alterat… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications in support of redevelopment of 155 Wellesley St. E.
Matched fields
address
155 WELLESLEY ST E
application_address
155 WELLESLEY ST E
Starlight Group Property Holdings Inc. · registration SM24696
Applications in support of redevelopment of 155 Wellesley St. E.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24696: Applications in support of redevelopment of 155 Wellesley St. E. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 241044 STE 27 OZ at 155 Wellesley St E: Applications for Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental HousingDemolition proposing the expansion and conversion of the first two storeys of an existing 18-storey, 116 unit residential rental apartment building to permit a two-storey medical facility andretail pharmacy. Alterat… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications in support of redevelopment of 155 Wellesley St. E.
Matched fields
address
155 WELLESLEY ST E
application_address
155 WELLESLEY ST E

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 5 communications · 5 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale5

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	5	5	11 June 2018

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Starlight Investments
SM24785 · 30 June 2017 · “155 Wellesley Street East”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

82 lobbied · 96 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=13
Matched, unlobbied90% n=14

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied16%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 82 lobbied and 96 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	82	—	100% (n=13)	0%	11%	0.15
Matched, unlobbied	96	—	90% (n=14)	10%	16%	0.08

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.