Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 17 235087 STE 28 SA

2 Toronto St; 34 King St E; 36 King St E; 50 King St E

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 19 September 2017; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 3; 3 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 2 Toronto St; 34 King St E; 36 King St E; 50 King St E
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 19 September 2017
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 219 units; 9,895 m² gross floor area
Related file: 16 159562 STE 28 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

INACTIVE Revised Site Plan Approval application to construct a 33-storey mixed use office and residential tower with ground floor retail uses containing 219 dwelling units, 9,895 sq.m office GFA, and 293.0 sq.m. retail GFA. This application is associated with the Tribunal approved rezoning, file no. 16 159562 STE 28 OZ.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Larco Investments · registration SM22977
Planning matters relating to the development of 34-36 and 50 King Street East and 2 Toronto Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22977: Planning matters relating to the development of 34-36 and 50 King Street East and 2 Toronto Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 235087 STE 28 SA at 34 King St E: INACTIVE Revised Site Plan Approval application to construct a 33-storey mixed use office and residential tower with ground floor retail uses containing 219 dwelling units, 9,895 sq.m office GFA, and 293.0 sq.m. retail GFA. This application is associated with the Tribunal approved rezoning, file no… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning matters relating to the development of 34-36 and 50 King Street East and 2 Toronto Street
Matched fields
address
50 KING ST E
application_address
50 KING ST E

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 3 communications · 3 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Offfice of Councillor McConnell, Ward 282
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Offfice of Councillor McConnell, Ward 28	Councillor staff	2	2	8 December 2016
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	1	1	27 April 2016

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Larco Investments
SM22973 · 7 April 2016 · “2 Toronto Street”
Larco Investments
SM22973 · 7 April 2016 · “50 King Street East”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13

56 lobbied · 128 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=8

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied7%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13: 56 lobbied and 128 matched unlobbied applications in 32 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	56	—	100% (n=5)	0%	7%	0.16
Matched, unlobbied	128	—	100% (n=8)	0%	2%	0.01

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.