Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 17 222740 STE 27 CD

50 Charles St E; 50-60 Charles St E; 61 Hayden St; 64 Charles St E

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 25 August 2017; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 11; 4 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 50 Charles St E; 50-60 Charles St E; 61 Hayden St; 64 Charles St E
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 25 August 2017
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 13 199558 STE 27 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft Plan of Standard Condominium to create 7 office units in the non-residential portion (59 Hayden St) of the recently constructed mixed-use building. This application is related to Site Plan Application No. 14 249782 STE 27 SA (50-64 Charles St E and 47-61 Hayden St).

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Cresford (Rosedale) Developments Inc. · registration SM19635
50 - 60 and 62 - 64 Charles Street East, and 47 - 61 Hayden Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19635: 50 - 60 and 62 - 64 Charles Street East, and 47 - 61 Hayden Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 222740 STE 27 CD at 61 Hayden St: Draft Plan of Standard Condominium to create 7 office units in the non-residential portion (59 Hayden St) of the recently constructed mixed-use building. This application is related to Site Plan Application No. 14 249782 STE 27 SA (50-64 Charles St E and 47-61 Hayden St). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 50 - 60 and 62 - 64 Charles Street East, and 47 - 61 Hayden Street
Matched fields
address
62-64 CHARLES ST E
application_address
64 CHARLES ST E

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 11 communications · 4 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale9
Office of Councillor Wong-Tam2

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	9	3	30 October 2014
Office of Councillor Wong-Tam	Councillor staff	2	1	14 May 2014

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Aird & Berlis LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11

4 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11: 4 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.