lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 17 190765 STE 32 OZ

144 Stephenson Ave; 276 Main St; 286 Main St; 290 Main St; 292 Main St; 294 Main St

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
30 June 2017
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
30
8 meetings · 5 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
144 Stephenson Ave; 276 Main St; 286 Main St; 290 Main St; 292 Main St; 294 Main St
Ward
Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
Submitted
30 June 2017
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
301 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate the development of a 30-storey mixed use building, with retail at the ground floor, a floor of office space and 301 residential units above. The existing public laneway is proposed to be widened, and the detached house at 144 Stephenson Avenue is proposed to be replaced. The dwelling replacement will be the subject of subsequent and separate development applications.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 30 communications · 8 meetings · 5 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
Data table· 6 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Brad BradfordCouncillor staff10021 June 2024
Ward 19 Beaches-East YorkMember of council7524 June 2020
Brad BradfordCouncillor staff5012 May 2021
Brad BradfordMember of council416 September 2023
Councillor Brad BradfordCouncillor staff2029 March 2021
Ward 32 Beaches-East YorkMember of council221 May 2017

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19

7 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19: 7 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 6 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied7Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied10Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.